I personally get really annoyed at portrait mode video. And while most of those users aren't going to go anywhere near a product like Resolve there are still an awful lot of content creators who could. But it is an increasingly popular way to shoot video globally. Portrait mode video is a vanishingly small percentage of the traditional cinematography industry that Resolve caters to. That says nothing about how many people actually shoot portrait mode video and would like to use Resolve if it were better optimized for them. That's a spurious argument - the percentage of Resolve users who shoot in portrait mode might very well be small precisely because Resolve's UI isn't very well laid out for editing portrait mode video. But trying to tell people they're wrong because they want something different than you just shows that, at best, you're out of touch.Įikonoklastes wrote:Obviously for somebody starting with 9x16 they're better off with what you're showing but what percentage of the Resolve user base does that? It may not come, because Resolve is funded by hardware sales to an industry for which this isn't a big issue. There's a valid need for a more flexible UI. Not to mention that having to buy hardware to address a software limitation is an indication that the software is, in fact, limited. Saying that Video Clean Feed on a second monitor is the solution ignores the issue that "clean feed" means you can't use the on-screen controls required for so many operations. Saying that Resolve can do portrait mode video ignores the problem, which is optimizing screen real estate for more users. YOU not needing them has nothing to do with the rest of the world. Saying that portrait isn't a thing is like saying tampons aren't a thing. I know it's hard for you to accept, but you are not the center of the universe and neither TikTok nor anything else will change because of your backward narrow minded opinion you're unfortunately stuck with. Tiktok seems to tbe the problem so why are you whining here?The only problem here is ignorant and arrogant people like you using feature requests of others as catalyst to cry about the word they want to be different. Someone has to produce them and why would BMD hold their users back? They will probably adjust eventually. Vertical video is everywhere, including video wall ads. Tiktok seems to tbe the problem so why are you whining here? Instergram does take both vertical and horizontal video now. There are a LOT of features a lot of other people are asking for that don't have workarounds.Īt the moment it is perfectly possible, in Resolve, to work around the limitations of Tiktok. If want them to change go to their forums and cry there? And please stop whining how you want the world / instagram to be. It's just the work around you want people to take so that BMD could save precious dev resources to make you happy instead of working on features others care. The other suggestion is that TikTok stops its restrictive practices and permits horizontal video like Faceboook and Instagram does.No, it's not the universal solution. The solution is to use a 2nd screen as the clean feed to get a bigger picture. The probem the OP has is that he is using a single small (laptop?) screen. You can do vertical video in Resolve NOW. Roger.magnusson wrote:Vertical video is everywhere, including video wall ads.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |